Talk:Jews Against Zionism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem[edit]

I was wrong i copied word for word from the main source of this article, i should have made it in quotes but now that this book has more sources that relies upon. I have rewritten the article, Talk:Jews Against Zionism (book)/Temp. So copyright infringement should no longer be of a problem.--יודל 11:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. After nearly 3 weeks and a relisting, we have a rough consensus that the book is the primary topic of the term. Cúchullain t/c 15:45, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jews Against Zionism (book)Jews Against Zionism – While "Jews Against Zionism" is a rough description about what Jewish anti-Zionism is about, it is no usual synonym nor a likely search term. A hatnote pointing to Jewish anti-Zionism should be enough. --PanchoS (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC) PanchoS (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC) relisted. SSTflyer 12:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per Forum on the Jewish People, Zionism and Israel 1985 "One manifestation of this trend is to be found in the activities of a small organization, Jews Against Zionism, whose major sources of inspiration are the radical Left, pro-PLO groups, and the American Council for Judaism." In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Both articles have comparable numbers of page views. The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Jews Against Zionism" is therefore likely to be the book. SSTflyer 12:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If "Both articles have comparable numbers of page views" then there is no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by definition. A 70% of all results is required. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am saying that people searching for "Jews Against Zionism" is unlikely to be looking for Jewish anti-Zionism. SSTflyer 00:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Says who? Why would they be looking for Jews Against Zionism: The American Council for Judaism, 1942–1948? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jews Against Zionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]