Talk:Foreign policy of the United States/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

potential Further reading

State vs. Defense: The Battle to Define America's Empire by Stephen Glain ASIN: B004KPM1NK Publisher: Crown (August 2, 2011) 97.87.29.188 (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Zbigniew Brzezinski resource?

  • Balancing the East, Upgrading the West; U.S. Grand Strategy in an Age of Upheaval by Zbigniew Brzezinski in January/February 2012 Foreign Affairs ; excerpt ...

    As the United States looks ahead, it faces two central challenges in foreign policy, writes a former national security adviser: enlarging the zone of prosperity and democracy in the West while balancing the rise of China and allaying the fears of the United States' Asian allies. Neither challenge can be addressed in isolation—for today, the fates of the West and the East are intertwined.

See East–West dichotomy 99.181.131.214 (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

map error

If it's supposed to be "major non-NATO allies plus Taiwan," why isn't Taiwan shaded? --SchutteGod (talk) 22:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

executive agreement vs treaty

executive agreement was merged into this page, however "executive agreement" vs treaty isnt very well described here. The history of these tools is different from the policies that are formed by them. The old 'Executive agreement' page says that US president can create executive agreements for three different reasons, only one of which is foreign policy. I think it would be good to unmerge executive agreement, describing how the tool works and the administrative processes involved (e.g. how are they disseminated, archived, etc) and providing notable examples of that tool being used instead of a congressional-executive agreement. John Vandenberg (chat) 23:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Treaty Clause#Scope_of_presidential_powers contains a better description of these agreements. John Vandenberg (chat) 00:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

RFC

This issue has been tagged for a year. I have posted a content Request for Comments, which should be published as soon as the bot that processes RFCs is fixed. I would and will comment that the article on executive agreements should be split out because executive agreements are not limited to the United States. After all, any US executive agreement has had at least one other head of government sign it. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Plan to Remove Tag

I plan to remove the conflict tag after allowing a period for comments. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Tag removed after no comments. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Relations with Pakistan

Hello, I am a little surprised not to be able to find the US relations with the Pakistan. I think it is a really important aspect today and it could be interesting to develop it. Let me know what you think about it. Thanks. --ACA Galaxy (talk) 05:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Criticism section

From past experience with "criticism" or "controversy" sections, I have seen that they often become POV magnets, and failing that, are NPOV violations, because weighting it relative to the rest of the article is impossible. Therefore, if there are no objections raised here, I propose to merge it with the rest of the article, with no loss of content. Thoughts? Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

i think it should stay--readers certainly expect such a section. Rjensen (talk) 00:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
I do not plan on deleting the content; however, it is far easier to write a balanced piece on US foreign policy in Guatemala, for instance, and including criticism, than it is to create a balanced section here; how on earth do we decide how long this should be? Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
how long should it be? that is an issue with every section of this article. it's what we as editors decide. Rjensen (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
I think you misunderstand. Yes, we decide the length of every section; in an area with copious sources, such as this one, that decision is mostly based upon WP:DUE. But criticism of US foreign policy rarely exists in the general form; there are far, far, more sources dealing with criticisms in specific areas. Therefore, for a general "criticism" section, due weight becomes near impossible to evaluate. Is that clearer? Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC
I am 100% with Vanamonde93 here. Criticism sections exclusively attract, well, criticism. That's a guarantee of NPOV problems. Include alternative views with the discussions on specific topics. HiLo48 (talk) 06:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion: the relations between US and XYZ has its own article and that's where specific criticism belongs--otherwise we have 100 new paragraphs here. This is a high-level article and should not get bogged down with each little country.Rjensen (talk) 06:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Friend, you are being the tiniest bit obtuse. Yes, we have separate articles for U.S.-XYZ relations; but by your logic, this entire article is then redundant. All I am saying, is that we have country specific and period specific sections here; those should be complete, that it, including criticism, rather than bunching it all at the bottom, like the big pile of dirt under the carpet. Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Foreign policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Foreign policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Foreign policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

War on Drugs section seems lonely without War on Terror

Somebody want to write a paragraph or two on the latter? One little sentence in Military doesn't seem to do it justice. It's sort of a big deal, you know? InedibleHulk (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Foreign policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Foreign policy of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States/Archive_2&oldid=1086591219"