Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. Timmeh!(review me) 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Checklist and analysis[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- As with every GA nominee I've reviewed, I've had to fix some minor formatting and grammatical errors, but there was nothing major.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- These are all good for GA.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Talks about all the major aspects of the album: its history, musical style, reception, release, etc.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: