Talk:China Can Say No

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Title of book[edit]

The title of the Chinese book (and of this Wiki article) is translated incorrectly. The Western media uses at least three different translation of the book title, making it extremely difficult to google the title.
The correct, literal translation is "China Can Say No". It is simple, straightfoward, and one the most commonly used translations for the book. Therefore, we should use it. 22:34, 6 August 2005 User:Ktchong

Continued after cut-and-paste page move[edit]

It was already debated on the old "The China That Can Say No" page and agreed that the new title of this page will be "China Can Say No" as this is the more literal and more accurate translation. Please stop changing it. --220.245.178.134 10:19, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
While this may be irrelevant, where can I order this book from in Canada? I'd be interested in reading it. 23:16, 5 January 2007 [User:24.202.74.133]]

Broken Links[edit]

I've just removed the 'external links' section, because all the links in it were dead. Here's what they were, in case anybody more adventurous wants to track down linkable versions:

China's Answer is Still No - analysis in Asiaweek
Review Sinorama magazine
2nd review Sinorama —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danohuiginn (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

criticizes[edit]

It specifically criticizes physicist Fang Lizhi and journalist Liu Binyan.

Doesn't say why these in particular. RJFJR (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]