Talk:Charlie Kimber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Etonian and son of a baronet[edit]

Interesting to see the unsourced claim that Kimber is an Etonian and son of a baronet, which would understandably be seized upon by his political opponents if true. It gets repeated in many left wing blogs but I couldn't see any cast iron evidence so I've removed it from the article.

I guess the "left leaning" baronet Charles Dixon Kimber[1] or his successor Timothy Roy Kimber would be the most likely fathers, but there's no evidence either had a son called Charles Nicholas. Sionk (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, there's an article in the Guardian that was the source but I will try to find a second source. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like Chinese whispers to me. How many other Kimber baronets are there? Based on there being so little hard information about Charlie Kimber, I question whether there should even be a Wikipedia article about him! Sionk (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well he's National Secretary of a national political party, albeit a not very successful one. Notability guidance at WP:POLOUTCOMES says "Leaders of registered political parties at the national or major sub-national (state, province, prefecture, etc.) level are usually considered notable regardless of that party's degree of electoral success." Is he a "leader"? The SWP have a collective leadership as far as I know and the most significant roles seem to be founder and national and international secretaries. Of those three, he was the only one who didn't have an article. A Google search suggests that he would probably meet the GNG too. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I see the founder is dead so Kimber is presumably one of the two most important individuals in the SWP. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well exactly, it doesn't have a leader as such. But newspapers regularly call him the 'boss' etc. of the SWP so I guess that will be good enough for Wikipedia.Sionk (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie Kimber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]