Talk:Camilla Long

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Notability[edit]

Seems a bit thin on substantial indi 2dary sources. Being on TV twice is a bit of WP:OR to say she's a TV personality. Media / journalist yes. Not enough sources to flesh this out past a stub, do we want it? Widefox; talk 14:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Camilla Long has been appointed film critic of The Sunday Times, I think notability has been established. New sources will now surely emerge. Philip Cross (talk) 17:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having a job? Well at least there's a RS. WP:AUTHOR fails 1-4. Think an AfD is warranted, Widefox; talk 19:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The additional award makes it clearly notable. Widefox; talk 21:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Penis paragraph[edit]

Who commented? Not clear. Notreallydavid (talk) 02:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moonlight review[edit]

I'm not sure that the Huffington Post citation at the end of the statement "She was accused of being homophobic and racist, although the review was defended as more a "waspish" response to other reviews perceived as overly congratulatory" actually supports the assertion in the way that is suggested? JezGrove (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]