Talk:CCF Maple Leaf Trainer II

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CCF Maple Leaf Trainer II article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / Canadian / North America / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled[edit]

Any reason we couldn't move this to CCF instead of "Canadian Car and Foundry"? It works for LTV! Maury 22:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds okay.IMHOBzuk 03:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Going for it... Maury 21:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An OBERVATION: The article has a contradictory statement: the Cruising Speed is referenced to 20,000 ft. altitude... which is way above the Service altitude; either altitude value is wrong. Needs to be corrected. amclaussen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.19 (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably means 2,000ft as the Scarab was not superchargedPetebutt (talk) 07:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]