Talk:Black cuckoo-dove

Black cuckoo-dove has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 3, 2021	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 2, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Birds Low‑importance

Black cuckoo-dove is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Black cuckoo-dove/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wretchskull (talk · contribs) 16:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A rather small article. No need to wait long to get a review.

Taxonomy and systematics

Link subspecies.

Done.

Vocalizations

Is there an audio file of the vocalizations available online? That would definitely be useful.

Added xeno-canto link.

Behavior and ecology

Link subcanopy.

Done.

General

The article is neutral and does not contain any ongoing edit wars or discussions.
The lede image is appropriately licensed.
Broadness, neutrality and WP:SUMMARY are met.
Anything of significance here?

No, but I've done a (significant) bit of searching and added some more taxonomy.

References

No copyvio found
Ref 1 and 7 are exactly the same.

Merged.

Spotchecks:
- Jobling ref supports all cited text.
- IOC ref supports all cited text (ref 3a). As for ref 3b, I assume that the fact that there isn't a comment about subspecies means that there are none for that particular species.
- Avibase ref supports all cited text.
- The Gibbs et al. book needs pages each time it is cited. Perhaps convert them to shortened footnotes and put the book in a bibliography section. AGF that it supports all cited text.
- Baptista et al. ref supports all cited text.
- IUCN ref supports all cited text.
- Kaszewska et al. ref supports all cited text.

@AryKun: Ping me when you're done. Wretchskull (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wretchskull:, I've addressed all your concerns. AryKun (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AryKun: The article has been promoted to GA. Wretchskull (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]