Talk:Bed of nails defense

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Cold War B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that in order to protect the Minuteman missile silos from attack, Richard Garwin proposed using a bed of nails? Source: Garwin
- Reviewed: Coffee Talk Episode 2: Hibiscus & Butterfly
- Comment: quite possibly the strangest yet also illuminating articles on cold war politics

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 197 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Very fascinating article; I had never heard of such a thing. Article is good and hook is interesting. I don't have access to the source so will assume good faith. Just waiting on a QPQ. —Panamitsu (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a link to JSTOR for the Garvin (1976) magazine article, which I hope will help. I note that almost all of the references are those of Richard Garwin, published over the span of about a decade, and that the proposal was never implemented. Nevertheless, and interesting article with an engaging hook that's also accurate! Klbrain (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Klbrain: QPQ Coffee Talk Episode 2: Hibiscus & Butterfly Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Klbrain: You going to do this? --evrik ^(talk)
    - It's not my nomination; sorry if I've misunderstood your ping. Klbrain (talk) 20:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New reviewer needed. --evrik ^(talk) 21:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The original reviewer, Panamitsu, was never pinged to review the QPQ. (t · c) buidhe 05:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the QPQ looks good. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for bringing another interesting article to Wikipedia. The referencing is rather Garvin-heavy, but given that it was his idea, and that he had little support, I suppose that's not surprising. Good luck with the DYK proposal!

Klbrain (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]