Talk:53rd Pennsylvania Infantry Regiment

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Content[edit]

This appears to have been sourced and largely copied from this webpage, although reworded in places. I leave it to other editors to determine whether it constitutes any form of copyright violation.--Lopakhin (talk) 14:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC) - and to add, that page is 'Copyright M. Jane Gelnett.1998-2000'. Could the originator of this page please clarify if he/she is that person? Either that or rewrite it a lot more, as I was able to locate the source by sticking a sentence or two into Google.--Lopakhin (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on Jekoury's talk page concerning this. I'll try to rewrite and condense the article over the next couple days. Wild Wolf (talk) 01:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sections[edit]

Perhaps it should be segmented it into logical sections, if only by month. A screen load of text is hard on the eyes. Not to mention visually boring. EraserGirl (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]