Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello MWright96, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you in some time. I hope you will find my feedback to be helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    MWright96, good work on the article, I've completed the review and could not find any significant issues. There are two minor ones which I have mentioned in the comments but otherwise this is more or less a good article so I've promoted it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
  • Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.

Assessment[edit]

  1. Comprehension: The article is very well written.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is clear, concise and understandable. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is compliant with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability:The article is verifiable.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article has a list of references and inline citation in the body, some minor issues exist. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used appear to be largely reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violation or plagiarism found, note earwig's brings a number of false positive due to the names. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images used are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use and captions are appropriate and illustrative. Pass Pass