Draft:Copyleaks
 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 18 days ago. (Update) |
Type of site | SaaS for AI Content and Plagiarism Detection |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Stamford, CT |
| Area served | Worldwide |
| Founder(s) | Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton |
| CEO | Alon Yamin |
| Industry | Education |
| URL | copyleaks |
| Registration | Yes |
Copyleaks, founded in 2015, is a plagiarism detection platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to attempt identifying similar and identical content across various formats and platforms.[1][2][3]
In 2022, Copyleaks raised $7.75 million dollars to expand anti-plagiarism capabilities.[4]
Functionality[edit]
Copyleaks includes tools for detecting plagiarism, paraphrasing and potential copyright violations, and also AI-based text analysis components to attempt distinguishing between content created by humans and content generated by artificial intelligence.[5][6]
Accuracy[edit]
While the accuracy of Copyleaks detection software is not confirmed, an article written by Kyle Wiggers and published by Tech Crunch in February of 2023 claimed that Copyleaks incorrectly classified numerous segments of text produced by LLM text models (especially with text produced from less popular language models like Claude from anthropic).[7]
An article written by Vahan Petrosyan, published on Search Engine Journal, also in February 2023, tested three AI outputs against Copyleaks detection. In the article, Petrosyan noted that Copyleaks correctly flagged generative prompts as AI-written.[8]
Copyleaks has claimed to be upwards of 99% accurate in detecting AI-generated content.[9][10] According to a report published by BBC, Copyleaks was used to flag an essay as AI generated that was turned in by a student.[11]
In March 2023, an article published to VentureBeat noted that Copyleaks showed an ability to accurately detect AI-written text.[12]
Research[edit]
Third party academic testing of Copyleaks published in September 2023, by Elkhatat et al, noted that Copyleaks struggled with high sensitivity, indicating to the researchers that at the time, that Copyleaks had an aggressive approach to detecting generative text content. Researchers noted that in comparison to another tool tested called GPTZero, Copyleaks algorithm appeared to be more strict, whereas GPTzero appeared to be more balanced; however both softwares revealed limitations and inaccuracies during the research conducted by Elkhatat, et al.[13]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ Staff, eSchool News (2023-06-08). "Open LMS Partners With Copyleaks, Adding Advanced AI-Driven Plagiarism and AI Content Detection". eSchool News. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
- ^ Donadel, Alcino (2023-04-11). "Your students aren't using AI as often as you think, studies find". University Business. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
- ^ "About Us". Copyleaks. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- ^ Tiffany & Steven, Hsu & Myers (May 18, 2023). "Another Side of the A.I. Boom: Detecting What A.I. Makes". The New York Times.
- ^ Lucariello, Kate (May 11, 2023). "Open LMS Partners with AI Detector to Combat Plagiarism -". Campus Technology. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
- ^ Kornick, Lindsay (2024-01-03). "AI platform CEO talks new tech detecting plagiarism following Harvard scandal: 'As prevalent as ever'". Fox News. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
- ^ Wiggers, Kyle (2023-02-16). "Most sites claiming to catch AI-written text fail spectacularly". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
- ^ Petrosyan, Vahan (2023-02-03). "AI Generated Content Detection Software: Can They Detect ChatGPT?". Search Engine Journal. Retrieved 2024-02-16.
- ^ Eric. "Studies Confirm AI Content Detector As Most Accurate". Copyleaks. Retrieved 2024-02-16.
- ^ Johnson, Arianna. "New Tool Can Tell If Something Is AI-Written With 99% Accuracy". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- ^ "How to spot an AI cheater". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- ^ Krishna, Sri (2023-03-01). "AI-generated content detection tools put to the test". VentureBeat. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- ^ Elkhatat, Ahmed M.; Elsaid, Khaled; Almeer, Saeed (2023-09-01). "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (1): 17. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5. ISSN 1833-2595.
External links[edit]