User talk:Nyxaros

Welcome to my talk page! Please do not bring discussions here from other pages. Please use diffs when talking about edits. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on your talk page or a relevant article talk page. I will not continue to watch a talk page if the discussion has migrated. I don't check my watchlist regularly. I don't always add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them, unless it's a user talk page or I started an important discussion. Thank you.

Your GA nomination of The Boy and the Heron

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Boy and the Heron you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Boy and the Heron

The article The Boy and the Heron you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Boy and the Heron for comments about the article, and Talk:The Boy and the Heron/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 09:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, Nyxaros! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Little mermaid

i think the whole debate had caused me to read on the rules, basically they usually want to specify what controversy it was, instead of just general controversies unless there were multiple controversies. In this case, the casting of Ariel was the only controversy and huge one at that. Either way i'm okay with both decision Merzostin (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

"Positive, Mixed, Negative" Reception

Mainly wanting to discuss this after your revert at Draft:73 Yards. While my comment of "mixed" was mostly temporary until the Reception got ironed out a bit more, stating the Reception of an episode in the lead doesn't fall under WP:SYNTH, given that the information is mentioned directly in the article. I agree it shouldn't be used if consensus is unclear, which I can see in 73 Yards's case, but if there's a strong leaning either way in the Reception, it's not inaccurate to quite literally summarize what's already in the article, and I've seen it be used effectively in many articles across the site, including in a large number of good articles. Given that I envision this might be a recurring subject of debate going forward, I would like to discuss this matter before it goes anywhere else. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Since I started a new section on your talk page before your message, I replied there again. ภץאคгöร 22:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Indeed. Apologies about the inconvenience with this talk page message, as I hadn't received the notification for its existence until after I had posted this. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)